Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2024, Vol. 21 Issue (2): 147-153    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2024.02.018
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
政府监管机制下港口企业的社会责任履行研究
王建华, 郝婷婷, 林超英, 朱敏
江南大学商学院,江苏 无锡 214122
Study on the Social Responsibility Fulfillment of Port Enterprises Under Government Regulatory Mechanism
WANG Jianhua, HAO Tingting, LIN Chaoying, ZHU Min
School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu
全文: PDF(1089 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为探究政府监管机制对港口企业履行社会责任的影响,分别构建了不同监管机制下地方政府与港口企业的演化博弈模型,并进行数值仿真分析。研究表明:在静态惩罚、奖惩监管机制下,双方不存在演化稳定策略。在动态惩罚、奖惩监管机制下,双方能够达成唯一演化稳定策略。政府动态惩罚监管机制要优于动态奖惩监管机制。此时,惩罚最高力度和政府监管成本会影响港口企业履行CSR概率的大小。为地方政府促进港口企业履行CSR提供了相应建议。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王建华
郝婷婷
林超英
朱敏
关键词 政府监管港口企业社会责任演化博弈    
Abstract:In order to investigate the influence of government regulatory mechanisms on the fulfillment of social responsibility by port enterprises, the evolutionary game models of local governments and port enterprises under different regulatory mechanisms are constructed and numerical simulations are conducted respectively.The study shows that there is no evolutionary stability strategy between the two parties under the static punishment,reward and punishment regulatory mechanism.Under the dynamic punishment,reward and punishment regulation mechanism, both parties can reach the only evolutionary stability strategy. The government′s dynamic punishment regulation mechanism is better than the dynamic reward and punishment regulation mechanism. In this case, the maximum strength of punishment and the cost of government regulation affect the probability of port enterprises to fulfill CSR. Corresponding suggestions are provided for local governments to promote the fulfillment of CSR by port enterprises.
Key wordsgovernment regulation    port companies    social responsibility    evolutionary game
收稿日期: 2022-10-24      出版日期: 2024-07-17
ZTFLH:  F274  
  F252  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71503103);国家社会科学基金(19FGLB031)
通讯作者: 郝婷婷(1999-),女,江苏扬州人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为港口物流。   
作者简介: 第一作者: 王建华(1965-),女,江苏无锡人,硕士,副教授,主要研究方向为工业工程与物流。
引用本文:   
王建华, 郝婷婷, 林超英, 朱敏. 政府监管机制下港口企业的社会责任履行研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 147-153.
WANG Jianhua, HAO Tingting, LIN Chaoying, ZHU Min. Study on the Social Responsibility Fulfillment of Port Enterprises Under Government Regulatory Mechanism[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2024, 21(2): 147-153.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2024.02.018      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V21/I2/147
[1]刘伟华.美国供应链危机原因与中国应对[J].人民论坛,2022(7):106-110.
LIU W H. Causes of the U.S. supply chain crisis and China′s response[J]. People′s Forum, 2022(7):106-110.
[2]张永锋,龚建伟,殷明.新冠肺炎疫情对中国港航业的影响及其对策[J].交通运输工程学报,2020,20(3):159-167.
ZHANG Y F, GONG J W, YIN M. Impact of the new crown pneumonia epidemic on China′s port and shipping industry and its countermeasures[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering,2020,20(3):159-167.
[3]刘家国,周欢,王军进, 等.演化博弈视角下的港口危化品监管机制研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2019,40(3):628-633.
LIU J G, ZHOU H, WANG J J, et al. Research on the regulatory mechanism of hazardous chemicals in ports from the perspective of evolutionary game[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University,2019,40(3):628-633.
[4]刘家国,王军进,周欢, 等.基于安全风险等级的港口危化品监管问题研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(5):1141-1152.
LIU J G, WANG J J, ZHOU H, et al. Research on the supervision of hazardous chemicals in ports based on safety risk level[J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice,2018,38(5):1141-1152.
[5]韩震,王菡,孟好.基于系统动力学的港口危险品管理演化博弈分析[J].大连海事大学学报,2019,45(2):28-35.
HAN Z, WANG H, MENG H. Evolutionary game analysis of port hazardous materials management based on system dynamics[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University,2019,45(2):28-35.
[6]李晓东,匡海波,胡燕.污染排放控制下港航企业合作减排策略研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2021,41(7):1750-1760.
LI X D,KUANG H B,HU Y. Research on cooperative emission reduction strategies of port and shipping enterprises under pollution emission control[J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice,2021,41(7):1750-1760.
[7]ZANNE M,TWRDY E,BESKOVNIK B.The effect of port gate location and gate procedures on the port-city relation[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(9): 4884.
[8]赵慧达,刘家国,王军进,等.考虑区块链技术投资的港航供应链决策研究[J].管理工程学报,2022(6):1-12.
ZHAO H D,LIU J G,WANG J J, et al.A study on port and shipping supply chain decision making consid-ering blockchain technology investment [J].Journal of Management Engineering,2022(6):1-12.
[9]YAP W Y, HOJ.Port strategy and performance: empirical evidence from major container ports andimplications for role of data analytics[EB/OL]. [2021-04-06]. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03088839.2021.2017040?cookieSet=1.
[10] LIU Y,QUAN B,XUQ,et al.Corporate social res-ponsibility and decision analysis in a supply chain through government subsidy[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,208:436-447.
[11] 李春发,来茜茜.政府监管下WEEE处理企业的社会责任履行决策研究[J].软科学,2020,34(8):57-64,108.
LI C F, LAI X X. A study on the social responsibility fulfillment decision of WEEE disposal enterprises under government regulation[J]. Soft Science,2020,34(8):57-64,108.
[12] 李春发,刘焕星,胡培培.政府分类规制、智能平台赋能与药企CSR策略演化[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2022,19(2):17-30.
LI C F, Liu H X, Hu P P.Government classification regulation, intelligent platform empowerment and CSRstrategy evolution of pharmaceutical companies[J].Complex Systems and Complexity Science,2022,19(2):17-30.
[13] 孟斌,沈思祎,匡海波,等.基于模糊-Topsis的企业社会责任评价模型——以交通运输行业为例[J].管理评论,2019,31(5):191-202.
MENG B, SHEN S Y, KUANG H B, et al. Corporate social responsibility evaluation model based on fuzzy-Topsis - taking the transportation industry as an example[J]. Management Review,2019,31(5):191-202.
[14] 余方平,刘龙方,孟斌,等.基于集对分析的交通运输行业企业社会责任组合评价研究[J].管理评论,2020,32(1):219-234.
YU F P, LIU L F, MENG B, et al. Research on the evaluation of corporate social responsibility portfolio in transportation industry based on set-pair analysis[J]. Management Review,2020,32(1):219-234.
[15] 孟斌,李菲,杨月.基于循环修正的交通运输行业企业社会责任评价研究[J].科研管理,2020,41(10):174-184.
MENG B, Li F, YANG Y. Research on the evaluation of corporate social responsibility in transportation industry based on circular correction[J]. Research Management,2020,41(10):174-184.
[16] SMITH J R M.The logic of animal conflict[J].Nature,1973,246(5427):15-18.
[17] PRICE P W.Strategies for egg production[J].Evolution,1974,28(1):76-84.
[18] TAYLOR P D,JONKER L B.Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics[J].Mathematical Biosciences,1978,40(1/2):145-156.
[19] FRIEDMAN,D.Evolutionary game in economics[J].Econometrica,1991,59(3):637-666.
[20] FRIEDMAN,D.On economic applications of evolutionary game[J].Theory Journal of Evolutionary Economics,1998,8(1):15-42.
[21] 焦建玲,陈洁,李兰兰,等.一.碳减排奖惩机制下地方政府和企业行为演化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(10):140-150.
JIAO J L, CHEN J, LI L L, et al. Game analysis of the evolution of local government and enterprise be-havior under carbon emission reduction reward and punishment mechanism[J].China Management Science,2017,25(10):140-150.
[1] 杨国忠, 周午阳. 基于供应链视角的企业协同生态创新演化博弈[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 120-128.
[2] 孙威威, 张峥. 基于复杂网络的电动汽车创新扩散博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 45-51.
[3] 谢振雨, 万安霞. 药品安全治理演化博弈及策略研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 129-136.
[4] 谢逢洁, 姚欣, 王思一. 高阶结构对无标度网络上合作行为演化的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 12-19.
[5] 宋美, 王振源, 葛玉辉, 刘举胜. 混合所有制企业高管团队动态合作行为演化博弈分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 85-91.
[6] 李春发, 俎晓彤, 田盖地. 价格竞争、保鲜努力与农产品电商冷链物流模式演化[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 100-108.
[7] 吕洋, 刘忠轶, 张振源, 刘溪溪. 小餐饮商户接入食品安全溯源体系策略博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 145-151.
[8] 陈陶, 冯文刚. 基于演化博弈的民航安检有效性提升研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(4): 77-84.
[9] 姜凤珍, 史晓妮. 社区建成环境改造中居民情绪传染机制及治理研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(4): 98-106.
[10] 袁亮, 祁煜智, 何伟军, 李闻钦, 吴霞. 跨国界河流水资源冲突演化博弈模拟研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(3): 90-96.
[11] 张骥骧, 陈晓竹. 考虑氮素流通效率的生态补偿策略演化博弈分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(2): 90-97.
[12] 张鹏, 菅利荣, 王丹丹. 共生网络视角下工业园生态转型治理机制研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(1): 95-104.
[13] 肖琴, 罗帆. 基于复杂网络的通用航空安全监管演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(3): 33-43.
[14] 赵炎, 宾晟, 孙更新. 区块链社交网络中信息传播模型研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(2): 1-8.
[15] 彭伟华, 侯仁勇, 李光红. 基于演化博弈的网络平台就业多元协同治理研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(2): 9-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Baidu
map